Posted by stanleypark on February 19, 2024, 10:16 pm, in reply to "Re: Maybe you didn't see the asterisk. I was referring to where we SHOULD be (nt)" ...as many would have it. If we had an attacker who could do what they're paid to do we'd be near safety right now. Previous Message I was referring to where we are. Responses But we don’t have any attackers that can score, so all things being equal, we are shit nt - bluechris February 19, 2024, 10:21 pm They've played shit tonight, but this is a bang average 12th-14th in the PL team. - stanleypark February 19, 2024, 10:25 pm I understand that our “true” position is much better but our recent form worries me - bluechris February 19, 2024, 10:39 pm The draws are killing us of late. That's why the first 45 minutes tonight was horrific to watch. - stanleypark February 19, 2024, 11:12 pm That’s the thing, for me… - Robin February 19, 2024, 11:08 pm Our recent results have been poor but performances have been ok - JC February 19, 2024, 11:22 pm That’s fair, altho we’ve rarely looked ‘good’… - Robin February 19, 2024, 11:36 pm We simply don't have the players to take the game to anyone - JC February 20, 2024, 12:02 am Harrison and Patterson are better (offensively) than Young and Godfrey… - Robin February 20, 2024, 12:43 am Re: I understand that our “true” position is much better but our recent form worries me - Aberblue February 19, 2024, 11:06 pm « Back to index
Post a Response WARNING! You have Javascript disabled in your browser, this form may not function correctly.Your Name: Subject: Message: clear Please Log in or Register. Optional Image URL: Optional Link Title:Optional Link URL: Notify me by email of all message replies. Remember my name for the next time I post.By posting, you confirm that you have read and agree to the board's usage terms. Upload
WARNING! You have Javascript disabled in your browser, this form may not function correctly.
Subject:
Notify me by email of all message replies. Remember my name for the next time I post.