Did Stormy Daniels possibly say enough for a mistrial?
Posted by Potomac on May 8, 2024, 8:30:10
Extensive details about an alleged sexual encounter with Trump are not really relevant to a trial about business transactions. Trump's team argued for a mistrial. What a colossal mistake it will have been for the prosecution if that actually happens.
I mean, did this help or hurt the prosecution:
Dinner never happened, but they had a wide-ranging talk, she said, about her childhood and the adult-film industry. He showed her pictures of his wife, Melania, Daniels testified, but assured her they slept in different bedrooms. He suggested she would be a good candidate on his reality show, “The Apprentice.” At one point, she called him rude, pompous and arrogant, she said, after he showed her a magazine with him as the cover story. She said, “Someone should spank you with that.” He rolled up the magazine and handed it to her, daring her, she said. “So, I took it from him and said, ‘Turn around.’ And swatted him.”
Have any of the accountants who made the journal entries say Trump said anything to them about them?
Extensive details about an alleged sexual encounter with Trump are not really relevant to a trial about business transactions. Trump's team argued for a mistrial. What a colossal mistake it will have been for the prosecution if that actually happens.
I mean, did this help or hurt the prosecution:
Dinner never happened, but they had a wide-ranging talk, she said, about her childhood and the adult-film industry. He showed her pictures of his wife, Melania, Daniels testified, but assured her they slept in different bedrooms. He suggested she would be a good candidate on his reality show, “The Apprentice.” At one point, she called him rude, pompous and arrogant, she said, after he showed her a magazine with him as the cover story. She said, “Someone should spank you with that.” He rolled up the magazine and handed it to her, daring her, she said. “So, I took it from him and said, ‘Turn around.’ And swatted him.”
This. If this proceeding had any integrity, it would not have been initiated to begin with.*
Extensive details about an alleged sexual encounter with Trump are not really relevant to a trial about business transactions. Trump's team argued for a mistrial. What a colossal mistake it will have been for the prosecution if that actually happens.
I mean, did this help or hurt the prosecution:
Dinner never happened, but they had a wide-ranging talk, she said, about her childhood and the adult-film industry. He showed her pictures of his wife, Melania, Daniels testified, but assured her they slept in different bedrooms. He suggested she would be a good candidate on his reality show, “The Apprentice.” At one point, she called him rude, pompous and arrogant, she said, after he showed her a magazine with him as the cover story. She said, “Someone should spank you with that.” He rolled up the magazine and handed it to her, daring her, she said. “So, I took it from him and said, ‘Turn around.’ And swatted him.”
The welfare of humanity is always the alibi of tyrants.
on May 8, 2024, 8:30:10
Previous Message