The easiest way to explain it is that the P gene sets a modification on the N and A genes. the evolutionary function of the P gene would be to keep society glued together, one symptom of that is empathy, another is forging bonds. Naturally, those that lack the P gene have less empathy. In the hands of a psychopathic NPA type, empathy just becomes a tool of manipulation. Along with that, the P gene defines the norm for ways of acting and reacting in social-political groups....the end result is that the P gene acts an internal set of checks and balances on both Narcissism and Aggression.
That's not to say it diminishes the strength of either but that it modifies the N gene and the A gene so as to support forging bonds with people, unification, solidarity.
Trump is Vain, Over-Competitive, and Power Hungry, with no modifications at all on either his aggressive or narcissism drives. Trump is a bonafide hypomanic that ran has campaign through exuberance and momentum. He is wired so that he only needs four hours of sleep at night to function at the pace that he does, a likely defense mechanism for somebody with huge ambitions that can only really rely on himself internally. Energy, his high energy always comes with a cyclothymia of moods that has him making gaffes left and right. But it also sends the inverse-positive message to voters that he has the follow through to do what he says. Like if he says he's going to do something, he'll really put all his energy into trying to do it, whereas Hillary might just have political reasons for saying she will try to do something.
another example of an NA and one even Dr. Benis would agree with is Teddy Roosevelt. Roosevelt wrote an essay called the strenuous life. He was a huge proponent of the Puritan work ethic in action. It was all ego driven, though. He worked at a hypomanic pace, read voraciously and ran on very little sleep. Hemingway was quite similar and is another NA. In many way, NPA types are less persistent and less industrious due to the weaker appetites they have. NA is the independent go-getter.
Now let's look more recently, the dnc versus rnc conventions and much of the campaign pitted a battle between Hillary's P trait versus Trump's lack of a P trait. the Hillary crowd declaring "Stronger Together" is better than Trump's go-it-alone rugged individualism, while the Trump Crowd counters back that a One Man Army can get more done in a single day than a bunch of corrupt bureaucrats can in a month. The fact of the matter is that Trump clearly has no internal check on his Narcissism or Aggression. He is not overbearing except to the extent that he's goal-oriented. He's been a go-it-alone guy for nearly his entire life. Both the NPA and NA are confrontational, but the NA type is a confrontational-independent and the NPA type is a confrontational-dependent. Chris Christie is an NPA type. He didn't have enough independence in him to break from the party line and grab the mantle of republican outsider. Rush Limbaugh is another NPA type. Ernest Hemingway is an NA type. The NA type is more macho and physically dominant than the NPA type due to what I have said before about them being independent.
With Hitler being an NPA+ type you see the N and A utilized specifically for manipulating people interpersonally and raising himself up by forging strong bonds between himself and the Germans and the Germans and the germans. An N like Napoleon didn't have that ability. His N gene lacked the capacity to develop bonds between people. It was more that Napoleon raised himself up through excelling and achieving within the military ranks. And through that acquired prestige raised himself up. He didn't do it by mirroring people's anger through fiery oratory nor did he do it by flattering the german people's bruised ego by selling them on an ideal of themselves. Hitler did, though, that's because hitler's N gene and A gene were modified by his P gene to form bonds with people.
Message Thread | This response ↓
« Back to index