Posted by Matty
on September 27, 2009, 16:31:18, in reply to "FLIGHT DECK-Edge PIERCINGS"
Message modified by board administrator November 8, 2009, 15:50:22
(Editor's Note: This analysis was performed using a method now greatly improved-upon, and is scheduled TO BE REDONE)
After the unexpectedly large mismatches found for Section I, I skipped to this analysis of Section IV; the starboard bow, and the area best-documented by my collection of references, overall. For direct comparison with the prior analysis, I limited these references to WWII- and SCB-27-fits only; for this Section reducing the set of relevant pics to the following:
Click on Image to Enlarge
And the SCB-27 references being the following:
Click on Image to Enlarge
Applying exactly the same interpretion as before, the following was indicated:
Not only do the persistent mismatches again occur, but now they are indeed starting to look randomly scattered over the Section - for both the WWII- and SCB-27-fits (top) - which strongly argues that the (reduced) number of reference pics is simply no longer adequate to the task (given my inherent errors). Although I again did my best to estimate a "generic" compromise layout (middle) note it simply appears to be randomly-spaced features; I don't find it very distinctive-looking, nor plausible.
I post this mainly FYI; I plan to revisit this analysis - incorporating (many) more reference pics, including the CVS- and LPH-fit pics most relevant to my Boxer build - after knocking out a couple other Sections which are presently even less well-defined...
Cheers,
-Matty
Responses:
