This messageboard is for Adults 18 years and over.
If you are under this age please leave the board.

Luton Outlaws accepts no responsibility for the content of this messageboard nor any other content posted on it.

Luton Outlaws disclaims all liability for such content to the fullest extent permitted by law.

What you read on here is 100% conjecture, fiction, lies, bullshit and complete bollocks. If you want to be taken seriously, you are in the wrong place.

Any potentially libellous comments that might jeopardise the future of this messageboard will therefore be deleted, and the person posting them will receive a ban.Enjoy.

    Jack Stacey sold on the cheap

    Posted by Ronbaynhams gloves on 8/7/2019, 18:06:59

    Only 4m for stacey then Bournemouth get 20m for tyron mings In my opinion an inferior player to stacey it's a joke!!

      Re: Jack Stacey sold on the cheap

      Posted by RonManager on 9/7/2019, 8:14:12, in reply to "Jack Stacey sold on the cheap"

      Just curious, how many times have you seen Mings play?

        Re: Jack Stacey sold on the cheap

        Posted by Sendero Luminoso on 8/7/2019, 21:50:21, in reply to "Jack Stacey sold on the cheap"

        You are a complete and utter twat.

          Re: Jack Stacey sold on the cheap

          Posted by Sendero Luminoso on 8/7/2019, 21:59:24, in reply to "Re: Jack Stacey sold on the cheap"

          There is another one in your bathroom mirror.

          Re: Jack Stacey sold on the cheap

          Posted by The Scout on 8/7/2019, 19:02:20, in reply to "Jack Stacey sold on the cheap"

          Before this summer the highest fee paid for a full back who had never kicked a ball in the Championship was less than £2.4m. In the last month we have completely smashed that record not once, but twice.

          Not only that but we sold one player who had served us for 14 years - not wishing to deprive him of a PL opportunity and the other who had a year left on his contract who could've walked away for nothing in a year.

          I would politely recommend you review you opinion and comments.

            Re: Jack Stacey sold on the cheap

            Posted by bbb on 8/7/2019, 23:28:14, in reply to "Re: Jack Stacey sold on the cheap"

            Decent post.

            No need for the last paragraph though.

            Best to just call him a clueless attention seeking spaz and be done with it IMO.

              Re: Jack Stacey sold on the cheap

              Posted by The Outsider on 8/7/2019, 19:12:51, in reply to "Re: Jack Stacey sold on the cheap"

              I agree with the points that you are making but it is not quite correct to say that neither of them had ever kicked a ball in the Championship - I assume that, at some stage in his six Championship appearances for Reading, Jack Stacey kicked the ball at least a few times

                Re: Jack Stacey sold on the cheap

                Posted by Corbyn fan on 8/7/2019, 19:03:39, in reply to "Re: Jack Stacey sold on the cheap"

                YUP

                Re: Jack Stacey sold on the cheap

                Posted by Ted on 8/7/2019, 18:46:16, in reply to "Jack Stacey sold on the cheap"

                Supply and command my friend, supply and command

                  Re: Jack Stacey sold on the cheap

                  Posted by Captain of goons and idiots on 8/7/2019, 19:21:31, in reply to "Re: Jack Stacey sold on the cheap"

                  Is that a clever play on words?
                  I don't get it.

                  Re: Jack Stacey sold on the cheap

                  Posted by Macy on 8/7/2019, 18:41:40, in reply to "Jack Stacey sold on the cheap"

                    Re: Jack Stacey sold on the cheap

                    Posted by Noddy on 8/7/2019, 18:40:28, in reply to "Jack Stacey sold on the cheap"

                    Mings is massively overpriced, but stacey could have left us for nothing in 12 months time

                      Re: Jack Stacey sold on the cheap

                      Posted by nev the bear on 8/7/2019, 18:22:55, in reply to "Jack Stacey sold on the cheap"

                      value and worth are not comparable

                        Re: Jack Stacey sold on the cheap

                        Posted by Paddy Hatter on 8/7/2019, 18:21:27, in reply to "Jack Stacey sold on the cheap"

                        A year left on his contract and he could have gone for less to WBA or god forbid Stoke.

                        Some people are never happy
                        Just thank him for bringing extra money to the club and staying to win the league one title ffs

                          Re: Jack Stacey sold on the cheap

                          Posted by J Block on 8/7/2019, 18:24:25, in reply to "Re: Jack Stacey sold on the cheap"

                          scumbag

                            Re: Jack Stacey sold on the cheap

                            Posted by Nearly a Genius on 8/7/2019, 18:19:28, in reply to "Jack Stacey sold on the cheap"

                            Player fees are not based on the opinion of a poster on the unofficial message board of a provincial Championship football team.

                              Re: Jack Stacey sold on the cheap

                              Posted by Gerty on 8/7/2019, 18:13:40, in reply to "Jack Stacey sold on the cheap"

                              Its not only how good the player is but things like how old and how long left on his existing contract.

                                Re: Jack Stacey sold on the cheap

                                Posted by joey diconio on 8/7/2019, 18:13:30, in reply to "Jack Stacey sold on the cheap"

                                What the Luton Town site failed to mention was Mr Stacey was out of contract next summer and would be over 24 thus leaving on a free transfer, we can only assume Jack has turned down offers last season and this summer to extend his stay with Luton Town so realistically £4m less 30% isnít bad business.

                                If there were better communication and transparency people might not get is such a tizz, but alas we are the mushrooms

                                  Re: Jack Stacey sold on the cheap

                                  Posted by J Block on 8/7/2019, 18:09:45, in reply to "Jack Stacey sold on the cheap"

                                  do we know it was 4m for definite?

                                  Re: Jack Stacey sold on the cheap

                                  Posted by Barry Sludge on 8/7/2019, 18:09:27, in reply to "Jack Stacey sold on the cheap"

                                  Wow.

                                  I have seen them both a lot of times and Mings is streets ahead. Stacey will make it though.

                                    Re: Jack Stacey sold on the cheap

                                    Posted by RADSB on 8/7/2019, 18:08:33, in reply to "Jack Stacey sold on the cheap"

                                    Isnít Staceyís fee a record for a League One full back!

                                      Re: Jack Stacey sold on the cheap

                                      Posted by since 63 on 8/7/2019, 18:10:01, in reply to "Re: Jack Stacey sold on the cheap"

                                      no, i believe James Justin holds that record

                                        Re: Jack Stacey sold on the cheap

                                        Posted by RADSB on 8/7/2019, 18:13:58, in reply to "Re: Jack Stacey sold on the cheap"

                                        Undisclosed wasn't it?

                                          Re: Jack Stacey sold on the cheap

                                          Posted by The Outsider on 8/7/2019, 18:22:03, in reply to "Re: Jack Stacey sold on the cheap"

                                          They were both Championship full backs when they were sold even though they haven't played in it for us - Stacey played a few Championship games for Reading.

                                            Re: Jack Stacey sold on the cheap

                                            Posted by since 63 on 8/7/2019, 18:17:59, in reply to "Re: Jack Stacey sold on the cheap"

                                            i believe JJ was a higher undisclosed fee than JS undisclosed fee.

                                  [ Luton Outlaws - The Avenue of Evil ]

                                  DISCLAIMER

                                  The posts made on this board are the opinions of the people posting them and do not always reflect the opinion of the board administration.

                                  Luton Outlaws is a totally independent forum, paid for and run by supporters of Luton Town and is not associated with Luton Town Football Club, lutontown.co.uk, lutonfc.com, Loyal Luton Supporters Club, Trust in Luton, Luton Town Supporters Club or anyone else for that matter and is declared a 100% Tombola Free Zone.

                                    Luton Outlaws accepts no responsibility for the content of this messageboard nor any other content posted on it. Luton Outlaws disclaims all liability for such content to the fullest extent permitted by law.

                                    What you read on here is 100% conjecture, fiction, lies, bullshit and complete bollocks. If you want to be taken seriously, you are in the wrong place. Enjoy. Admin contact - dilligaf.outlaws@gmail.com.

                                  eXTReMe Tracker