Re: L. C. Smith Field Grade Archived Message Posted by tom carrier on January 8, 2011, 7:30 am, in reply to "Re: L. C. Smith Field Grade" 72.73.4.167 david is right,if the gun wasnt hot blued.i have had several lc`s totally redone,some were worn more than others but i like to have nice looking guns!most of the ones i had redone were shootable the way they were except an old syrcuse 10 ga that the stock split after i had bought and shot it.as the saying goes "life is too short to hunt with an ugly gun!" tom Message Thread: L. C. Smith Field Grade - John Vickers January 7, 2011, 11:50 am Re: L. C. Smith Field Grade - John Liles January 7, 2011, 1:28 pm Re: L. C. Smith Field Grade - John Vickers January 8, 2011, 6:26 am Re: L. C. Smith Field Grade - David Williamson January 8, 2011, 7:16 am Re: L. C. Smith Field Grade - tom carrier January 8, 2011, 7:30 am Re: L. C. Smith Field Grade - John Vickers January 8, 2011, 10:09 am Re: L. C. Smith Field Grade - David Williamson January 8, 2011, 12:08 pm Re: L. C. Smith Field Grade - John Vickers January 8, 2011, 12:41 pm Re: L. C. Smith Field Grade - Tom Salzer January 10, 2011, 3:13 pm Re: L. C. Smith Field Grade Passed the Test - John Vickers January 10, 2011, 3:00 pm   Searching