Posted by Larry Jordan on March 11, 2006, 12:24 am It turns out that several years ago, Den Dulk published an interview with Charlie Louvin in which Mr. Louvin talked about the subject of ESP! In fact, he speculated that Jim had it and appeared to give it credence! If the same standards are to apply here, this must mean that Arie is PROMOTING THE OCCULT! Egad! After all, this information appeared in his publication. Here is the story: In an interview with Arie den Dulk, Charlie Louvin recalled that "I know that these things happen to you, but on the Saturday night [before the week Jim got killed], he came to the Opry... He didn't sing simply because he had a very bad cold. He couldn't have sung. He came to the Opry, in the Ryman Auditorium, shook hands with everybody and just visited for awhile, maybe an hour and a half. Seen everybody that was there and he went home. That's the last time that any of his friends like me, got to see him. It's like he knew and we didn't think about it, until it was over. You know, you look back he came and said bye to everyone. WE ALL GET FEELINGS, SOME PEOPLE CALL IT *ESP* AND DIFFERENT THINGS, BUT I THINK WE ARE FOREWARNED ABOUT CERTAIN THINGS, AND IF YOU PAY NO ATTENTION TO YOUR INNER SELF, THEN SOMETIMES YOU GET IN DAMNED TROUBLE BECAUSE YOU DIDN'T PAY ATTENTION." I am shocked, SHOCKED, that this appeared in Arie den Dulk's newsletter. He is, as you know, THE most trustworthy person in the world on matters pertaining to Jim. This must mean that Den Dulk has Oiuja boards and Tarot cards in his home because Frank Anderson said that anybody who mentions psychic subjects even in passing MUST be full of "devilment." I only hope that Arie's children were not forced to read his newsletter containing the Louvin interview because I share Frank's genuine concern that "children should not be exposed to things like that."
Message modified by board administrator June 22, 2006, 2:06 am
Earlier this week Frank Anderson used Arie's website to launch multiple attacks on our magazine as well as our teenage daughter and me. He claims we are promoting the "occult" because he ran across a small review we published of a book pertaining to premonitions. The book was mentioned in a column that included reviews of three other books on unrelated subjects and our daughter shared a byline with another writer (NOT me).
Responses: