Posted by Tim_NC on 3/30/2009, 5:11 pm, in reply to "Re: Jeff Masters latest blog: The case for a new QuikSCAT satellite"

It's the first thing that came to my mind too. Proenza was strategically correct but he made tactical errors. His opponents, now forced to accept his strategy - must drink from the cup of hypocricy and cover my ass. Tim in Cape Fear, NC --Previous Message-- : The part of the article dealing with the : replaced director Proenza seems like a lot : of double talk to me. For instance, the : whole point of Master's article is to say : that Quikscat needs to be updated so that we : can rely on it in the future. Well, that was : the substance of what Proenza said, yet, : ostensibly he was replaced because of : related claims about NHC dependence on : Quikscat. Yet his major point is being : adopted here by Masters! Sounds like a lot : of double talk. : : --Previous Message-- : : : http://www.wunderground.com/blog/JeffMasters/comment.html?entrynum=1204 : : I didn't know it would take so long to get a : replacement. If what we have fails, it could : be many years before we get a replacement. : : :