Posted by Ron on November 6, 2009, 10:38 am
75.104.160.36
Liberals try to cash in on Major Nidal Malik Hasan Propaganda by deed
FreeRepublic ^ | 6 Nov 09 | Elhombrelibre
Posted on Friday, November 06, 2009 10:34:45 AM by elhombrelibre
Lenin called terrorism propaganda by deed. He said the purpose of terrorism is to terrorize. Is it a sense of terror that makes Liberals play the Quislings role with regard to men like Major Nidal Malik Hasan. Obviously, the Liberals in the news media are willing to jump on the news of the mass murders Major Nidal Malik Hasan committed and use this as an opportunity to sell their agenda. Thus, are patently absurd notions advanced that he was a victim of mass-murder-causing-name-calling that led to the Major to slaughter in pre-meditated murder those who had done him no harm. Would they be so cavalier if they’d lost a family member in the shooting?
Major Nidal Malik Hasan is another in a long line of Arab and Moslem terrorists who has gotten a pass from the Liberal media. Sirhan Sirhan, a Palestinian-American, like Major Nidal Malik Hasan, was one of the first Arab terrorists to impact the US, and despite killing a Kennedy he was treated as just another nut. Major Hasan is getting the special Liberal treatment as they interpret his evil for their advantage. The poor fellow has been deployed too much. Oops, no deployments in his record. Major Hasan was called names in the highly courteous military and we’re to believe a Field Grade Officer was being verbally harassed to the point where mass murder was his only option. Okay, that’s silly. An army too PC to kick Hasan out for his polemics supporting suicide bombers is believed by the media to be so bigoted and lacking of good order as to allow a man’s heritage to be mercilessly thrown in his face without regard for discipline in the ranks? Major Hasan was harassed, but GEN Abizaid, also an Arab, earned four stars, and we’re to believe the US Army is full of bigots deserving a bullet from a fellow soldier? Give me a break.
A few better questions are why do Liberals instinctively feel more pity for the mass-murdering felon than his victims? Why do they claim to know his motives, which always support their liberal agenda? Why do they project malice onto his victims? Why do they not recognize that they’ve succumbed to the Stockholm Syndrome when they suck up to terrorists? Why is it, even after 9/11, they prefer more to fight with and malign their fellow Americans than to confront our common foe?
Here again Liberals, who historically rushed to be apologists for the USSR, are embarrassing themselves as they try to exploit these murders to end the war in Iraq and Afghanistan on their terms, the same terms as America’s enemies.
47
Message Thread:
« Back to thread