Posted by The Happy Hippy on October 9, 2004, 11:44 am, in reply to "winston silcott" --Previous Message-- Yes he is a convicted murderer, but that doesn't mean that he killed PC Blakelock, so why if he didn't kill PC Blakelock ( as the courts have determined ) should he be considered guilty of his murder ? You seem to be in favour of labelling people as guilty of crimes they didn't commit.
62.252.64.16
: silcott is still a convicted murderer
: and should never have been cleared of
: killing p.c. blakelock
Message Thread:
![]()
« Back to thread
Please note that only the last 200 messages are stored; spam will therefore be deleted.