Posted by Tannhaeuser on 5/2/2007, 11:51 pm, in reply to "Re: D&D Fanon" Now this is odd. I was watching the interview with Michael Reaves that appears on the Contender DVD set of Dungeons & Dragons (aka the British version) and Reaves said that he was not especially aware of any particular Hank/Sheila relationship (“I mean, obviously they liked each other…”) and that he would have leaned more toward a Hank/Diana ship (in which, by the way, I would have heartily agreed with him). Does that mean that Hank/Sheila is fanon after all, or does the (somewhat ambivalent) authority of the series bible, which says they might be “an item,” suffice to make that idea canon? And is the authority of Reaves’s unproduced script, which contradicts the opinions expressed by other series writers on Venger’s paternity, I believe, great enough to establish that idea as canon? Or are both those ideas just fanon ideas after all? P.S.: Has anyone heard from any of the fans who did the Contender commentary lately?
Message modified by user Tannhaeuser 5/2/2007, 11:52 pm
At one time I would have said that the Hank/Sheila ship and the idea that Venger was DM’s physical son were unproven fanon …
Message Thread:
« Back to thread