Posted by Corinne/CO on January 10, 2009, 7:00 pm, in reply to "Re: Question, Shoshana ..."
207.200.116.138
Countrywide wants two.
--Previous Message--
: "... the NNA says that You only
: have to return 1 RTC to the
: lender"
:
: That's not the NNA's call to make -
: that's up to each individual
: lender...now if they'd re-word it to
: say "a MINIMUM of one executed
: RTC per party in interest should be
: returned to the lender" that
: would be a bit more acceptable. But
: as I said...IMO that's up to each
: lender, not the NNA.
:
: --Previous Message--
: No. Not at all. It's the first I heard
: about that. I just started out by
: asking a colleague here in AZ. After
: all these years, I was wondering if I
: was doing it wrong. She said that the
: NNA says that You only have to return
: 1 RTC to the lender.
:
: --Previous Message--
: I'm wondering if your questions are
: stemming from the ridiculous stuff
: being put on the internet by some
: idiot in FL trying to blame NSA's for
: non-compliant RTC disclosure? He's a
: real piece of work, refuses to source
: his data and there is NOTHING out
: there to back up his claims. It's a
: marketing ploy, at the expense of
: NSA's. (To everyone, please do NOT
: identify the guy here, it will only
: fuel his internet presence.)
:
: --Previous Message--
: Another notary just told me that if
: the
: lender includes more than 1 RTC per
: person in the package, she just has
: each borrower sign one and shreds the
: rest. For the borrower's package she
: would of course have them each sign 2
: completed RTC's.
: I have always had the borrower sign
: however many are in the lender's
: package and 2 per person in the
: borrower's package.
: I am wondering if I have been doing it
: wrong all these years.
: TIA
:
:
:
:
:
:
:
Message Thread:
« Back to thread