Okay, but wouldn't a nominee by Hillary or any other Democrat ALSO "change" the Constitution? Besides, as I said, ANY real change to the Constitution has a Democratic process to go through. And no one branch of the government can do it alone. So that fear is unfounded.
It is not the living, breathing part I want. Because Trump's pick to replace Kennedy will change the Constitution. There is a lot of talk about Roe v. Wade. If there will be any Legislating from the Bench, it will be done by Conservatives.
No. Yes, the Constitution can be changed, but there's a proper way to do that. If the courts are going to start legislating from the bench, then they just made one of the three branches of government worthless. AND eliminated one of the checks and balances put into the Costitution. Is that the living and breathing part you want?
Isn't the Constitution supposed to not be a living, breathing document? I'm confused.
I'd be okay with that except some of my favorite people and family are liberals and for some wierd reason I Love 'em. I say instead we pass a new Constitutional Amendment called the Golden rule: Do unto others as you would have them do unto you. Anyone not able to abide that amendment would be summarily deported.
Why don't we just get rid of all Liberals? Establish a autocracy ruled by Conservative for Conservatives. Forget Democracy. It is over-rated; am I right?
https://news4sanantonio.com/news/local/viral-video-shows-teen-attacked-for-wearing-make-american-great-again-hat
The tolerant left strikes again.
29
Message Thread | This response ↓
« Back to index