Tao Speaks: Re: Is there such a thing as "philosophical Daoism"?

Re: Is there such a thing as "philosophical Daoism"?

Posted by Butcho on 1/28/2012, 10:54 am, in reply to "Re: Is there such a thing as "philosophical Daoism"?"
75.88.44.x

Wayne,

I am glad to see that you are finally getting your act together.

Sometimes its lonely being me.

... I'd rather be a smartass than a dumbass.

If the shoe fits don't throw it at me.

Besides, you would miss anyways as I haven't been myself lately.

Butcho

--Previous Message--
:
:
: You have to be able to interpret, not
: translate.
:
: Example taken from
: classical-daoism-is-there-really-such-a-thing-
:
:
:
: The sage is not clever:
:
: Should read the sage is not wise, all
: knowing, is not a Know It All, is not a Wise
: Ass.
:
: The problem with being wise, clever,
: guileful, is that almost everything that
: come to the mind of the Know-It-All is taken
: to be Absolute fact, Absolutely Good
: Knowledge; Knowledge issuing forth from this
: single source having a dual quality, is
: given to two Name, is duplicitous, guileful,
: absolutely Bad Knowledge mistaken to be
: Absolutely Good Knowledge; the two names
: given this Knowledge of a Clever, deceptive
: mind, being the Knowledge of Good and Evil,
: Absolutely Bad Knowledge mistaken to be
: Absolutely Good Knowledge.
:

153

Message Thread

Is there such a thing as "philosophical Daoism"? - Bao Pu 10/22/2011, 4:58 pm
- Re: Is there such a thing as "philosophical Daoism"? - gar 10/23/2011, 6:13 am
  - Re: Is there such a thing as "philosophical Daoism"? - Bao Pu 10/24/2011, 5:16 am
  - Re: Is there such a thing as "philosophical Daoism"? - Butcho 1/28/2012, 10:47 am
- Re: Is there such a thing as "philosophical Daoism"? - Wayne L 10/25/2011, 10:04 pm
  - Re: Is there such a thing as "philosophical Daoism"? - Butcho 1/28/2012, 10:54 am
- Re: Is there such a thing as "philosophical Daoism"? - Butcho 1/28/2012, 10:46 am
- important to differentiate - renying wd 11/2/2012, 12:45 am
  - Re: important to differentiate - Bao Pu 11/2/2012, 2:36 am
    - Re: important to differentiate - continued 1/4/2013, 11:16 am
« Back to index

Post a Response

Your Name:

Your Email:

Subject:

Message:

--Previous Message-- : Wayne, : : I am glad to see that you are finally : getting your act together. : : Sometimes its lonely being me. : : ... I'd rather be a smartass than a dumbass. : : If the shoe fits don't throw it at me. : : Besides, you would miss anyways as I haven't : been myself lately. : : Butcho : : --Previous Message-- : : : You have to be able to interpret, not : translate. : : Example taken from : : classical-daoism-is-there-really-such-a-thing- : : : : The sage is not clever: : : Should read the sage is not wise, all : knowing, is not a Know It All, is not a Wise : Ass. : : The problem with being wise, clever, : guileful, is that almost everything that : come to the mind of the Know-It-All is taken : to be Absolute fact, Absolutely Good : Knowledge; Knowledge issuing forth from this : single source having a dual quality, is : given to two Name, is duplicitous, guileful, : absolutely Bad Knowledge mistaken to be : Absolutely Good Knowledge; the two names : given this Knowledge of a Clever, deceptive : mind, being the Knowledge of Good and Evil, : Absolutely Bad Knowledge mistaken to be : Absolutely Good Knowledge. : : :

Optional Image URL:

Optional Link Title:
Optional Link URL:

Notify me by email of all message replies.

By posting, you confirm that you have read and agreed to be bound by the board's usage terms.

"The Tao is basically utterly open. Utter openeness has no substance. It ends in endlessness, begins in beginninglessnes".
-Li Daoqun ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Webmaster: zentao00@yahoo.com