Tao Speaks: Re: Were's the sun? & indeterminability

Re: Were's the sun? & indeterminability

Posted by rat on 4/20/2011, 6:58 am, in reply to "Re: Were's the sun?"
108.28.65.x

--Previous Message--
:
:
: --Previous Message--
:
: --Previous Message--
:
:
: --Previous Message--
:
: Greetings Wulf,
:
: It seems to me Wulf that center is
: infinitely small in that all things are only
: passing through. In movement, no one place
: exists and is only defined by the observer.
:
:
: in peace,
: gar
:
:
:
: Gar - what about this idea:
:
: Sun is center of the planets ...
: how does this fit to your idea?
:
:
: Greetings Wulf,
:
: To me Wulf the sun is relative to the
: observer. But where is it in the complexity
: of the astronomical calculations of now??
:
: As far as i know, never at the complete
: center.
:
: in peace,
: gar
:
:
:
: Gar
:
: maybe this enlightens us about
: "absolute"
:
: Greetings Wulf,
:
: Perhaps the only "absolute" is
: change.
:
: Like most observers my perceptoins seem to
: be either this or that. But when we listen
: to music or the sound of song birds perhaps
: we can resonate with the flow of being.
:
: in peace,
: gar
:
That was Zhuangzi's guess gar: 無常 Wu chang nothing posited as eternal.

Or as our Friend Thomas who used to post here translates: indeterminability

love,
rat

172

Message Thread | Skip to this response ↓

can laozi's dao be noble - beautiful - ugly - evil - benevolent? ... absolute? - wulf 4/18/2011, 8:45 am
- Re: can laozi's dao be noble - beautiful - ugly - evil - benevolent? ... absolute? - rene 4/18/2011, 9:41 am
  - Re: can laozi's dao be noble - beautiful - ugly - evil - benevolent? ... absolute? - wulf 4/18/2011, 11:56 am
    - Re: can laozi's dao be noble - beautiful - ugly - evil - benevolent? ... absolute? - rene 4/21/2011, 11:25 am
- Re: can laozi's dao be noble - beautiful - ugly - evil - benevolent? ... absolute? - Steve 4/18/2011, 1:13 pm
  - is it laozi's dao ? - wulf 4/19/2011, 3:40 am
    - the symbols as picture - wulf 4/19/2011, 3:46 am
    - Re: is it laozi's dao ? - gar 4/19/2011, 5:13 am
      - Re: is it laozi's dao ? - wulf 4/19/2011, 8:00 am
        
        Were's the sun? - gar 4/19/2011, 10:31 am
        
        Re: Were's the sun? - wulf 4/19/2011, 12:32 pm
        
        Re: Were's the sun? - gar 4/20/2011, 6:17 am
        
        Re: Were's the sun? & indeterminability - rat 4/20/2011, 6:58 am
        
        Re: Were's the sun? & indeterminability - wulf 4/20/2011, 10:05 am
        
        Re: Were's the sun? & indeterminability - rat 4/20/2011, 10:53 am
    - Re: is it laozi's dao ? - josef 4/19/2011, 12:01 pm
      - Re: is it laozi's dao ? - wulf 4/20/2011, 10:08 am
- Re: can laozi's dao be noble - beautiful - ugly - evil - benevolent? ... absolute? - isabeau 4/21/2011, 11:54 am
  - Re: can laozi's dao be noble - beautiful - ugly - evil - benevolent? ... absolute? - wulf 4/21/2011, 2:18 pm
    - Re: can laozi's dao be noble - beautiful - ugly - evil - benevolent? ... absolute? - isabeau 4/23/2011, 1:31 pm
      - nobility as result of daoist practise - wulf 4/24/2011, 10:07 am
        
        Re: nobility as result of daoist practise - isabeau 4/25/2011, 8:28 am
- Re: can laozi's dao be noble - beautiful - ugly - evil - benevolent? ... absolute? - Wayne L 5/5/2011, 11:56 pm
  - absolute? - wulf 5/6/2011, 1:13 pm
    - Re: absolute? - Wayne L 5/6/2011, 10:11 pm
      - Re: absolute? - wulf 5/7/2011, 6:32 am
        
        codes - rene 5/7/2011, 5:36 pm
        
        Re: absolute? - Wayne L 5/7/2011, 10:36 pm
        
        Re: absolute? - wulf 5/8/2011, 7:09 am
        
        Re: absolute? - Wayne L 5/9/2011, 2:19 pm
        
        Re: absolute? - wulf 5/10/2011, 6:50 am
      - Re: absolute? - gar 5/7/2011, 7:30 am
        
        Re: absolute? - Wayne L 5/8/2011, 1:01 am
« Back to index

Post a Response

Your Name:

Your Email:

Subject:

Message:

--Previous Message-- : : : --Previous Message-- : : : --Previous Message-- : : --Previous Message-- : : : --Previous Message-- : : Greetings Wulf, : : It seems to me Wulf that center is : infinitely small in that all things are only : passing through. In movement, no one place : exists and is only defined by the observer. : : : in peace, : gar : : : : Gar - what about this idea: : : Sun is center of the planets ... : how does this fit to your idea? : : : Greetings Wulf, : : To me Wulf the sun is relative to the : observer. But where is it in the complexity : of the astronomical calculations of now?? : : As far as i know, never at the complete : center. : : in peace, : gar : : : : Gar : : maybe this enlightens us about : "absolute" : : Greetings Wulf, : : Perhaps the only "absolute" is : change. : : Like most observers my perceptoins seem to : be either this or that. But when we listen : to music or the sound of song birds perhaps : we can resonate with the flow of being. : : in peace, : gar : : That was Zhuangzi's guess gar: : 無常 Wu chang nothing posited : as eternal. : : Or as our Friend Thomas who used to post : here translates: indeterminability : : love, : rat :

Optional Image URL:

Optional Link Title:
Optional Link URL:

Notify me by email of all message replies.

By posting, you confirm that you have read and agreed to be bound by the board's usage terms.

"The Tao is basically utterly open. Utter openeness has no substance. It ends in endlessness, begins in beginninglessnes".
-Li Daoqun ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Webmaster: zentao00@yahoo.com