Tao Speaks: Re: stolen content

Re: stolen content

Posted by josef on 2/15/2011, 2:23 pm, in reply to "stolen content"
24.32.223.x

Impossible to discuss without first defining love as meant here, the reality represented by the word.

Jan's words from above reveal the problem, or at least part of it:

"This is surely a possibility that I love to leave open, because I would like mysticism to be about love (though I do not see why, to be honest)"

I don't see why, either, as I have have no idea what the word truly points to in this context, and without agreement on that, useful discussion seems impossible. It's usually used with assumption of...something. But what? Definition, someone, anyone?

josef

155

Message Thread

stolen content - rat 2/15/2011, 12:58 pm
- Re: stolen content - josef 2/15/2011, 2:23 pm
  - love, rong, all-embracing, fond of chocolate - rat 2/15/2011, 5:40 pm
    - Re: love, rong, all-embracing, fond of chocolate - gar 2/15/2011, 9:05 pm
      - Re: love, rong, all-embracing, fond of chocolate - rat 2/17/2011, 8:23 am
    - Re: love, rong, all-embracing, fond of chocolate - josef 2/16/2011, 8:22 am
      - p.s. - josef 2/16/2011, 10:45 am
      - Re: love, rong, all-embracing, fond of chocolate - rat 2/17/2011, 8:33 am
        
        Re: love, rong, all-embracing, fond of chocolate - josef 2/17/2011, 9:10 am
      - erbjudanden på ikea - powmfc 2/22/2012, 3:12 pm
    - rong2 - wulf 2/16/2011, 11:22 pm
      - Re: rong2 - rat 2/17/2011, 8:35 am
« Back to index

Post a Response

Your Name:

Your Email:

Subject:

Message:

--Previous Message-- : Impossible to discuss without first defining : love as meant here, the reality represented : by the word. : : Jan's words from above reveal the problem, : or at least part of it: : : "This is surely a possibility that I : love to leave open, because I would like : mysticism to be about love (though I do not : see why, to be honest)" : : I don't see why, either, as I have have no : idea what the word truly points to in this : context, and without agreement on that, : useful discussion seems impossible. It's : usually used with assumption of...something. : But what? Definition, someone, anyone? : : josef : : :

Optional Image URL:

Optional Link Title:
Optional Link URL:

Notify me by email of all message replies.

By posting, you confirm that you have read and agreed to be bound by the board's usage terms.

"The Tao is basically utterly open. Utter openeness has no substance. It ends in endlessness, begins in beginninglessnes".
-Li Daoqun ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Webmaster: zentao00@yahoo.com