Tao Speaks: Re: Zhuangzi and Derrida

Re: Zhuangzi and Derrida

Posted by rat on 2/13/2011, 6:00 pm, in reply to "Re: Zhuangzi and Derrida"
108.28.65.x

--Previous Message--
:
:
: --Previous Message--
: Paul Fry on Derrida:
: "deconstruction is precisely the
: deconstruction of the grounds whereby we
: suppose our thinking can be derived from one
: or another definite concept."
:
: ("definite" is "ding" in
: Zhuangzi)
:
:
:
: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Np72VPguqeI&feature=list_related&playnext=1&list=SPD00D35CBC75941BD
:
:
: Deconstruction = non-reification?
:
Yes josef, I think it indicates nearly the same thing.

From Wiki: "In Derrida's view, deconstruction is a tradition inherited via Heidegger (the French term "déconstruction" is a term coined to translate Heidegger's use of the words "Destruktion"—literally "destruction"—and "Abbau"—more literally "de-building").

So perhaps deconstruction is de-reification.

love, rat

183

Message Thread

Zhuangzi and Derrida - rat 2/12/2011, 7:21 pm
- Re: Zhuangzi and Derrida - josef 2/13/2011, 10:32 am
  - Re: Zhuangzi and Derrida - rat 2/13/2011, 6:00 pm
    - Re: Zhuangzi and Derrida - josef 2/13/2011, 7:36 pm
      - Re: Zhuangzi and Derrida - rat 2/15/2011, 6:37 am
        
        Re: Zhuangzi and Derrida - gar 2/15/2011, 9:14 am
        
        Re: Zhuangzi and Derrida - josef 2/15/2011, 11:35 am
        
        Re: Zhuangzi and Derrida - gar 2/15/2011, 8:50 pm
        
        gratis_saker - ERBJUDANDEN 2/18/2012, 4:12 pm
        
        Re: Zhuangzi and Derrida - rat 2/15/2011, 12:55 pm
        
        Re: Zhuangzi and Derrida - gar 2/15/2011, 8:41 pm
        
        liang xing and tian jun - wulf 2/16/2011, 3:38 am
        
        Re: liang xing and tian jun - rat 2/17/2011, 8:38 am
        
        Re: liang xing and tian jun - wulf 2/18/2011, 3:41 am
        
        Re: liang xing and tian jun - rat 2/18/2011, 7:05 am
« Back to index

Post a Response

Your Name:

Your Email:

Subject:

Message:

--Previous Message-- : : : --Previous Message-- : : : --Previous Message-- : Paul Fry on Derrida: : "deconstruction is precisely the : deconstruction of the grounds whereby we : suppose our thinking can be derived from one : or another definite concept." : : ("definite" is "ding" in : Zhuangzi) : : : : : http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Np72VPguqeI&feature=list_related&playnext=1&list=SPD00D35CBC75941BD : : : Deconstruction = non-reification? : : Yes josef, I think it indicates nearly the : same thing. : : From Wiki: "In Derrida's view, : deconstruction is a tradition inherited via : Heidegger (the French term : "déconstruction" is a term coined : to translate Heidegger's use of the words : "Destruktion"—literally : "destruction"—and : "Abbau"—more literally : "de-building"). : : So perhaps deconstruction is de-reification. : : love, rat :

Optional Image URL:

Optional Link Title:
Optional Link URL:

Notify me by email of all message replies.

By posting, you confirm that you have read and agreed to be bound by the board's usage terms.

"The Tao is basically utterly open. Utter openeness has no substance. It ends in endlessness, begins in beginninglessnes".
-Li Daoqun ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Webmaster: zentao00@yahoo.com