Posted by Nina
![]()
on 11/26/2009, 5:45 pm, in reply to "Re: A Question for the Scholars?"
98.112.136.x
: I have always thought of the Tao as another
: word for the ineffable. To date I see no
: fundamental difference between I AM THAT I
: AM and the Tao. For me they are both
: pointing at the same reality. I could be
: wrong.
:
: Butcho
:
If your perspective is working for you, Butch, then how could it be wrong?
It might not work for me, but that doesn't matter.
I sure wish I had a piece of pumpkin pie right now. With lots of whipped cream! :-)
399
Message Thread | Skip to this response ↓
![]()
« Back to index
"The Tao is basically utterly open. Utter openeness has no substance. It ends in endlessness, begins in beginninglessnes".
-Li Daoqun
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Webmaster: zentao00@yahoo.com Donations help to support, upgrade and expand the Tao Speaks! community..Fight Spam! Click Here!