
Posted by gar on 2/3/2008, 9:19 am, in reply to "Re: mei you wenti (no problem)"
70.100.197.X
--Previous Message--
: rat, Having met the prescribed period of a few
: days it would appear that i seem to have
: forgotten the significance of the question.
: All that remains is a vague sense of
: aversion to the notion of either taoist or
: buddhist humility and the archetypal vision
: of Dorothy picking up the Ruby Slippers like
: some wish fulfilling jewel from the steaming
: remains of the witch-like Skandhic Form. The
: fact that my words now stain and besmirch
: your otherwise rather excellent website
: should be a cause for widespread uproar.
: Amitofo!
:
Lian Dao,
So, it seems to me that, if we didn't think our words had substance, we wouldn't use them.
One question please, if we have an innate desire to communicate why not express our own sense of reality even if what we communicate is just illusionary?
Words, maybe one path to happiness.
in peace,
gar
| 54 |
|
Message Thread:
|
"The Tao is basically utterly open. Utter openeness has no substance. It ends in endlessness, begins in beginninglessnes".
-Li Daoqun
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Webmaster: zentao00@yahoo.com Donations help to support, upgrade and expand the Tao Speaks! community..