Tao Speaks: Re: definition-based recommendation on how to think about science

Re: definition-based recommendation on how to think about science

Posted by gar on 1/30/2008, 2:45 pm, in reply to "Re: definition-based recommendation on how to think about science"
70.100.197.X

--Previous Message--
: Hi Dagmar,
:
: i
: think that science comes in by being open to
: ideas/possibilities or not so attached to
: previous assumptions and experiences to
: allow them to cloud discoveries.
:
: I quite agree: Unwillingness to test
: something new is bad science!
:
: To challenge the science, one must devise a
: test. To devise the test and to do the
: testing is to follow the Dao of science.
:
: Wayward,
:
: -J
:Greetings all,

It seems to me, if you don't have the correct tools for conducting a test, the data will be invalid.
Quantum physics seems to peer into the minuscule with inadequate tools.

in peace,
gar

Message Thread:

radio show - how to think about science - dagmar 1/19/2008, 3:55 pm
- Re: radio show - how to think about science - Wayne L 1/20/2008, 12:40 pm
  - Re: radio show - how to think about science - Chris 1/21/2008, 7:59 pm
  - Re: radio show - how to think about science - dagmar 1/23/2008, 10:03 am
- Re: definition-based recommendation on how to think about science - Jaime 1/24/2008, 12:57 am
  - Re: definition-based recommendation on how to think about science - gar 1/24/2008, 6:40 am
    - Re: definition-based recommendation on how to think about science - Chris 1/24/2008, 6:10 pm
    - Re: definition-based recommendation on how to think about science - Jaime 1/24/2008, 6:11 pm
  - Re: definition-based recommendation on how to think about science - dagmar 1/24/2008, 9:20 pm
    - Re: definition-based recommendation on how to think about science - Jaime 1/25/2008, 10:11 pm
      - Re: definition-based recommendation on how to think about science - dagmar 1/30/2008, 1:30 pm
        
        Re: definition-based recommendation on how to think about science - Jaime 1/30/2008, 2:24 pm
        
        Re: definition-based recommendation on how to think about science - gar 1/30/2008, 2:45 pm
        
        Re: definition-based recommendation on how to think about science - Jaime 1/31/2008, 11:23 am
        
        Re: definition-based recommendation on how to think about science - Wayne L 2/1/2008, 9:05 am
        
        Re: definition-based recommendation on how to think about science - Jaime 2/1/2008, 1:36 pm
        
        Re: definition-based recommendation on how to think about science - Pharos 2/2/2008, 1:25 pm
- Re: radio show - how to think about science - Bao Pu 1/25/2008, 4:12 pm
  - Re: radio show - how to think about science - dagmar 1/30/2008, 1:40 pm
« Back to thread

Post a Response

Your Name:

Your Email:

Subject:

Message:

--Previous Message-- : : : --Previous Message-- : Hi Dagmar, : : i : think that science comes in by being open to : ideas/possibilities or not so attached to : previous assumptions and experiences to : allow them to cloud discoveries. : : I quite agree: Unwillingness to test : something new is bad science! : : To challenge the science, one must devise a : test. To devise the test and to do the : testing is to follow the Dao of science. : : Wayward, : : -J :Greetings all, : : It seems to me, if you don't have the : correct tools for conducting a test, the : data will be invalid. : Quantum physics seems to peer into the : minuscule with inadequate tools. : : in peace, : gar : :

Optional Image URL:

Optional Link Title:
Optional Link URL:

Notify me by email of all message replies.

By posting, you confirm that you have read and agreed to be bound by Boardhost's usage terms.

"The Tao is basically utterly open. Utter openeness has no substance. It ends in endlessness, begins in beginninglessnes".
-Li Daoqun ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Webmaster: zentao00@yahoo.com