[ Post a Response | Tao Speaks ]
Posted by dagmar on 1/30/2008, 1:30 pm, in reply to "Re: definition-based recommendation on how to think about science"
68.145.209.X
: Here is where science comes in: He says
: there "must be" a form-giving
: field? Why must there? What is dependent
: upon it, that fails to occur in the absence
: of such? What is his evidence for the
: asertion? A mere "argument from
: design" is a logical fallacy. "We
: don't know why there is thunder so it must
: be the gods playing skittles."
personally, i don't know the answer to the questions you've asked, maybe the morphic field hypothesis is as valid as others. i think that science comes in by being open to ideas/possibilities or not so attached to previous assumptions and experiences to allow them to cloud discoveries.
Dagmar
| 48 |
"The Tao is basically utterly open. Utter openeness has no substance. It ends in endlessness, begins in beginninglessnes".
-Li Daoqun
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Webmaster: zentao00@yahoo.com Donations help to support, upgrade and expand the Tao Speaks! community..
