
Posted by wulf on 1/13/2008, 4:15 am, in reply to "Enlightenment??"
78.52.7.X
--Previous Message--
: Greetings All,
:
: Today, I heard the saying, "same but
: different". When i first heard these
: words, oh so many years ago, it reminded me
: of the days when i could just see the
: difference, or the commonality of things.
: So, when i ask myself, gar, what is
: enlightenment i think back to the time when,
: 'this and that dissolved into a state where
: duality is lost.
:
: Reality now appeares to me through three
: eyes, one eye fo this, another eye for that,
: and a third eye for neither, this or that.
:
: in peace,
: gar
:
:
:
i think that this corresponds to laozi's definition of enlighment - ming2
in ddj 16 we can find the keywords - how laozi is understanding enlightment (ming2)
you have ming if you know about chang2
you know about chang2 if you are able to return to destiny of nature
the return to destiny of nature is the return to the root called jing4
given by yun yun 
it is given by bing4
the building of complementing pairs
pointing to the "ONE" viewable by
"...a third eye for neither, this or that. "
| 72 |
"The Tao is basically utterly open. Utter openeness has no substance. It ends in endlessness, begins in beginninglessnes".
-Li Daoqun
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Webmaster: zentao00@yahoo.com Donations help to support, upgrade and expand the Tao Speaks! community..