[ Post a Response | The SteelNavy.Com Message Board ]
Don't forget the Venturas...
Multi role land- and sea medium bombers, very successful in the South Pacific. They were used in the antishipping as well as airfield denial role very successfully. A few squadrons (including my dad's VB 142), helped perfect glide bombing techniques adopted by the ASAAF's B-25's in the region also, to help protect from Japanese land based AA. Several Japanese ships went down or damaged due to Ventura bombing.
It's difficult to assess how many tons of merchant shipping German aircraft in European waters accounted for and it was not only by FW200's but also Ju87, Ju88 and He111 - and in the Med. the Italians were also active.
The Condor was good against single ships or some convoys as long as there was no opposition, but after in introduction of CAM-fighters and the early escort carriers their luck had run its course.
The B-17 was a high-altitude strategic bomber not equipped for low-level attack. It was replaced in the Pacific with the longer range, higher bomb load B-24, mainly because of the wish to keep all Fortresses in North-Europe where they had a slightly better record of survival that the Liberator.
At Midway the B-26 Marauders - medium-altitude bombers - also fitted with torpedoes - did not do much better also incurring losses.
At that stage USAAF was still in a steep learning curve - but learnt quickly.
Later in the war Beaufighter's, Mosquitoes and Mitchell's did much better because they were more manoeuvrable, better armed and better trained for the job.
SteelNavy.Com Home Page