Re: hmmm, now that's a little eerie. Archived Message
Posted by metalhedz on July 9, 2011, 12:14 am, in reply to "Re: hmmm, now that's a little eerie."
It's quite simple the prosecution could not prove how she was killed or by whom, their whole case was was circumstantial and left lots of room for reasonable doubt. But you are still without a doubt a reactionary asshole who reads and reacts without context and I don't heed a jury to prove that....
|
Message Thread:
- hmmm, now that's a little eerie. - BlueDog1 July 8, 2011, 5:37 pm
- Re: hmmm, now that's a little eerie. - Norad July 8, 2011, 10:53 pm
- Re: hmmm, now that's a little eerie. - formerGCian July 8, 2011, 11:28 pm
- attn, Norad, metalhedz and bob - BlueDog1 July 9, 2011, 5:33 am
|
|