But at least there are two solutions, whether you like them or not.
I never said either one was perfect. The first solution could take a few years to see appreciable change, but it will come. That old store of ammo will be exhausted someday.
If anything, no one will want to waste their supply on indiscriminate shooting and going hog wild with their guns in the woods.
But hey, I would never infringe on your right to bare arms. I mean if you prefer not to wear a hoodie in the winter or a jacket, that's on you.
And the right to bear arms....well same thing. How could I....even without the constraints of checks and balance get everyone's guns....I can't.
But a stranglehold on powder, lead and brass? None of those three things are enumerated in the Constitution.
Not one gun taken from 'good law abiding' gun owners in the process. There is no need.
Other than figuratively fighting fire with gasoline, what was your solution again?
When you ban books before you ban guns, you've admitted that you're more afraid of children learning than you are of children dying.
Responses
« Back to index | View thread »