Posted by Louis
![]()
on 6/11/2009, 2:53 pm, in reply to "Re: Which would you choose ?"
70.51.172.87
I agree that these cars are NO investments !
Besides the floor pans, what should I look for underneath the cars ? Anything particular to the Spits ?
Thanks for your input !
--Previous Message--
: I like round tails better, so the 69
: would have the upper hand. Better yet
: if it has the small crank 1296. Probaly
: be the deal closer. BUT, the 71 has
: the cleanest lines of the square tails.
: And the 79 is the most
: "luxurious" of those you
: listed (and heaviest with those
: bumpers).
:
: I would probably go the the one in best
: condition. HINT...you under the car.
:
: Don't look at these cars as an
: investment, unless you want results
: like my 401k of late.
:
: --Previous Message--
:
:
: Assuming you had the opportunity to buy
: 4 different Spitfires for a frame-off
: restoration project. All are in very
: comparable shape (body, engine,
: interior, etc.) and the asking price is
: about the same for each:
:
: One is a '69, the other a MKIV from
: '71, the 3rd one is either '73 or a '74
: (not sure) and the last one is a '79
: 1500.
:
: None have a hard-top available and none
: have overdrive.
:
: Considering the availability for parts,
: value of a restored car, pleasure to
: drive, etc, and again, assuming the
: amount of work and money to spend is
: very similar for all cars: wich one
: would you choose ?
:
: Thanks for sharing your wisdom !
:
:
:
: Louis, Vaudreuil
:
:
:



Responses: