Posted by theSufi on August 25, 2009, 9:10:41, in reply to "the plot seems to be thickening...who'da thunk it!"
3x a (high) normal level for women would still be less than a low normal level for a man. i'm not sure how significant this is.
aren't the most successful female athletes always going to be the most masculine ones?
why is this surprising?
Message Thread:
« Back to thread