Re: Nepal King defends absolute rule decision

Posted by Martin C. (Martin C) on 19/2/2007, 17:20:42, in reply to "Nepal King defends absolute rule decision "
80.161.84.52

Would'nt it have been wiser to wait with such comments until his position is cleared by the constitutional assembly?

---

Message Thread: Nepal King defends absolute rule decision - Lukasz 19/2/2007, 10:31:56 Re: Nepal King defends absolute rule decision - Martin C. 19/2/2007, 17:20:42 Re: Nepal King defends absolute rule decision - Robert 22/2/2007, 14:05:36 Re: Nepal King defends absolute rule decision - Dag T. Hoelseth 23/2/2007, 9:41:38 Re: Nepal King defends absolute rule decision - Lukasz 23/2/2007, 12:11:18 Re: Nepal King defends absolute rule decision - Christopher Buyers 26/2/2007, 9:07:35 Re: Nepal King defends absolute rule decision - Lukasz 26/2/2007, 12:06:10 Re: Nepal King defends absolute rule decision - Dag T. Hoelseth 26/2/2007, 9:05:50 Re: Nepal King defends absolute rule decision - Lukasz 26/2/2007, 12:08:43 Re: Nepal King defends absolute rule decision - Martin C. 26/2/2007, 15:06:33 Re: Nepal King defends absolute rule decision - Robert 26/2/2007, 16:05:20 Re: Nepal King defends absolute rule decision - Steve 26/2/2007, 16:13:19 Re: Nepal King defends absolute rule decision - Dag T. Hoelseth 26/2/2007, 16:22:06 Re: Nepal King defends absolute rule decision - Christopher Buyers 27/2/2007, 8:47:40 « Back to thread

---

Post a Response