Posted by Martin C. on 19/2/2007, 17:20:42, in reply to "Nepal King defends absolute rule decision " Would'nt it have been wiser to wait with such comments until his position is cleared by the constitutional assembly? 336 Message Thread Nepal King defends absolute rule decision - Lukasz 19/2/2007, 10:31:56 Re: Nepal King defends absolute rule decision - Martin C. 19/2/2007, 17:20:42 Re: Nepal King defends absolute rule decision - Robert 22/2/2007, 14:05:36 Re: Nepal King defends absolute rule decision - Dag T. Hoelseth 23/2/2007, 9:41:38 Re: Nepal King defends absolute rule decision - Lukasz 23/2/2007, 12:11:18 Re: Nepal King defends absolute rule decision - Christopher Buyers 26/2/2007, 9:07:35 Re: Nepal King defends absolute rule decision - Lukasz 26/2/2007, 12:06:10 Re: Nepal King defends absolute rule decision - Dag T. Hoelseth 26/2/2007, 9:05:50 Re: Nepal King defends absolute rule decision - Lukasz 26/2/2007, 12:08:43 Re: Nepal King defends absolute rule decision - Martin C. 26/2/2007, 15:06:33 Re: Nepal King defends absolute rule decision - Robert 26/2/2007, 16:05:20 Re: Nepal King defends absolute rule decision - Steve 26/2/2007, 16:13:19 Re: Nepal King defends absolute rule decision - Dag T. Hoelseth 26/2/2007, 16:22:06 Re: Nepal King defends absolute rule decision - Christopher Buyers 27/2/2007, 8:47:40 « Back to index
Post a Response WARNING! You have Javascript disabled in your browser, this form may not function correctly.Your Name: Subject: Message: clear Please Log in or Register. Optional Image URL: Optional Link Title:Optional Link URL: Notify me by email of all message replies. Remember my name for the next time I post.By posting, you confirm that you have read and agree to the board's usage terms.
WARNING! You have Javascript disabled in your browser, this form may not function correctly.
Subject:
Notify me by email of all message replies. Remember my name for the next time I post.