Re: Revised Raw Classifications

Posted by norm lowder on December 31, 2011, 3:08 pm, in reply to "Revised Raw Classifications"
174.140.90.45

I am a returning lifter. I think the classifacations are fine. If ppl just use it for a tool and not a standard,i think it is meant to encourage lifters to improve and move through the ranks and be more competive.I dont beliele it is there to make anyone feel weak.

129




Message Thread Revised Raw Classifications - Brian S December 28, 2011, 11:54 pm Re: Revised Raw Classifications - norm lowder December 31, 2011, 3:08 pm Re: Revised Raw Classifications - Ronald W. Jeffery December 29, 2011, 5:07 am Re: Revised Raw Classifications - Ronald W. Jeffery December 29, 2011, 2:29 pm Re: Revised Raw Classifications - Ronald W. Jeffery December 29, 2011, 3:14 pm cTAxKYdqewo - Sudzumiya August 8, 2012, 11:11 pm Re: Revised Raw Classifications - Ronald W. Jeffery December 29, 2011, 8:10 pm Re: Revised Raw Classifications - Ed Kutin December 30, 2011, 12:24 pm Re: Revised Raw Classifications - Ronald W. Jeffery December 30, 2011, 3:51 pm Re: Revised Raw Classifications - da December 30, 2011, 9:09 am da - Jackson Lee December 30, 2011, 11:57 am Re: da - Ronald W. Jeffery December 30, 2011, 3:24 pm Re: da - Ronald W. Jeffery December 30, 2011, 4:28 pm Re: Revised Raw Classifications - Ronald W. Jeffery December 30, 2011, 9:45 am Re: Revised Raw Classifications - Ed Kutin December 29, 2011, 1:59 pm « Back to index | View thread »

Post a Response