Re: Revised Raw Classifications

Posted by Ronald W. Jeffery on December 30, 2011, 3:51 pm, in reply to "Re: Revised Raw Classifications"
71.60.151.193

Sounds pretty good,Ed. While talking with my friend Phill Rosenstern, we discussed this. He thought it would be nice if top twenty five in age groups and weight classes, were kept nationally. It would be nice but would also be an awful lot of work sorting out all the different organizations. Personally, I don't think there are twenty five lifters my age and weight class, to compare. Speaking for myself, I'd rather lift than do paperwork. Good lifting to all. As long as you're making progress, you have nothing to feel bad about. Good day !!!

112




Message Thread Revised Raw Classifications - Brian S December 28, 2011, 11:54 pm Re: Revised Raw Classifications - norm lowder December 31, 2011, 3:08 pm Re: Revised Raw Classifications - Ronald W. Jeffery December 29, 2011, 5:07 am Re: Revised Raw Classifications - Ronald W. Jeffery December 29, 2011, 2:29 pm Re: Revised Raw Classifications - Ronald W. Jeffery December 29, 2011, 3:14 pm cTAxKYdqewo - Sudzumiya August 8, 2012, 11:11 pm Re: Revised Raw Classifications - Ronald W. Jeffery December 29, 2011, 8:10 pm Re: Revised Raw Classifications - Ed Kutin December 30, 2011, 12:24 pm Re: Revised Raw Classifications - Ronald W. Jeffery December 30, 2011, 3:51 pm Re: Revised Raw Classifications - da December 30, 2011, 9:09 am da - Jackson Lee December 30, 2011, 11:57 am Re: da - Ronald W. Jeffery December 30, 2011, 3:24 pm Re: da - Ronald W. Jeffery December 30, 2011, 4:28 pm Re: Revised Raw Classifications - Ronald W. Jeffery December 30, 2011, 9:45 am Re: Revised Raw Classifications - Ed Kutin December 29, 2011, 1:59 pm « Back to index | View thread »

Post a Response